Trust Assessment
payments received a trust score of 79/100, placing it in the Mostly Trusted category. This skill has passed most security checks with only minor considerations noted.
SkillShield's automated analysis identified 2 findings: 0 critical, 1 high, 1 medium, and 0 low severity. Key findings include Missing required field: name, Excessive permissions declared in manifest.
The analysis covered 4 layers: Manifest Analysis, Static Code Analysis, Dependency Graph, LLM Behavioral Safety. All layers scored 70 or above, reflecting consistent security practices.
Last analyzed on February 15, 2026 (commit 1823c3f6). SkillShield performs automated 4-layer security analysis on AI skills and MCP servers.
Layer Breakdown
Behavioral Risk Signals
Security Findings2
| Severity | Finding | Layer | Location | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIGH | Excessive permissions declared in manifest The skill declares 'Bash', 'Write', and 'Edit' permissions in its manifest. For a skill described as a 'payments expert' and explicitly noted as a 'security rubric' with non-executable examples, these permissions are overly broad. 'Bash' allows arbitrary command execution, and 'Write'/'Edit' allow modification of files. Such broad access poses a significant security risk if the skill were to be compromised or misused, as it could lead to system compromise or data manipulation beyond its stated purpose. Review and restrict the 'allowed-tools' in the skill's manifest to the absolute minimum necessary for its intended function. For a rubric or informational skill, 'Bash', 'Write', and 'Edit' are typically not required and should be removed. | LLM | manifest | |
| MEDIUM | Missing required field: name The 'name' field is required for claude_code skills but is missing from frontmatter. Add a 'name' field to the SKILL.md frontmatter. | Static | plugins/specweave-payments/skills/payments/SKILL.md:1 |
Scan History
Embed Code
[](https://skillshield.io/report/cb29042ce1d4a167)
Powered by SkillShield