Trust Assessment
roon-controller received a trust score of 87/100, placing it in the Mostly Trusted category. This skill has passed most security checks with only minor considerations noted.
SkillShield's automated analysis identified 2 findings: 0 critical, 0 high, 2 medium, and 0 low severity. Key findings include Unpinned Python dependency version, Unpinned Dependency in requirements.txt.
The analysis covered 4 layers: Manifest Analysis, Static Code Analysis, Dependency Graph, LLM Behavioral Safety. All layers scored 70 or above, reflecting consistent security practices.
Last analyzed on February 13, 2026 (commit 13146e6a). SkillShield performs automated 4-layer security analysis on AI skills and MCP servers.
Layer Breakdown
Behavioral Risk Signals
Security Findings2
| Severity | Finding | Layer | Location | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEDIUM | Unpinned Python dependency version Requirement 'roonapi>=0.1.6' is not pinned to an exact version. Pin Python dependencies with '==<exact version>'. | Dependencies | skills/puterjam/roon-controller/requirements.txt:2 | |
| MEDIUM | Unpinned Dependency in requirements.txt The `requirements.txt` file specifies `roonapi>=0.1.6`, which uses a minimum version specifier instead of pinning to an exact version. This can lead to supply chain risks, as future installations might pull in newer, potentially incompatible, or vulnerable versions of the dependency without explicit review. It also makes builds non-deterministic. Pin the dependency to an exact version, e.g., `roonapi==0.1.6`, or use a lock file mechanism (like `pip-tools` or `Poetry`) to ensure deterministic installations. Regularly review and update pinned dependencies. | LLM | requirements.txt:2 |
Scan History
Embed Code
[](https://skillshield.io/report/982cc88ff51ab5ed)
Powered by SkillShield